Is the Yedikule-solitary pulmonary nodule malignancy risk score sufficient to predict malignancy? An internal validation study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to develop a malignancy risk score model for solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) using the demographic, radiological and clinical characteristics of patients in our centre. The model was then internally validated for malignancy risk estimation. METHODS: A total of 270 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for SPN between June 2017 and May 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, cut-off values were determined for radiological tumour diameter, maximum standardized uptake value and the Brock University probability of malignancy (BU-PM) model. The Yedikule-SPN malignancy risk model was developed using these cut-off values and demographic, radiological and clinical criteria in the first 180 patients (study cohort) and internally validated with the next 90 patients (validation cohort). The Yedikule-SPN model was then compared with the BU-PM model in terms of malignancy prediction. RESULTS: Malignancy was reported in 171 patients (63.3%). Maximum standardized uptake value and BU-PM scores were sufficient to predict malignancy (P < 0.001 for both), while the effectiveness of nodule size determined on thoracic computed tomography did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.09). When the Yedikule-SPN model developed with the study cohort was applied to the validation cohort, it significantly predicted malignancy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.883, 95% confidence interval: 0.827-0.957, P < 0.001). Comparison of patients in the validation group with Yedikule-SPN scores above (n = 53) and below (n = 37) the cut-off value of 65.75 showed that the malignancy rate was significantly higher among patients with Yedikule-SPN score over 65.75 (86.8% vs 21.6%, P < 0.001, odds ratio = 23.821, 95% confidence interval: 7.805-72.701). When compared with the BU-PM model in all patients, the Yedikule-SPN model tended to be a better predictor of malignancy (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The internally validated Yedikule-SPN model is also a good predictor of the malignancy of SPN(s). Prospective and multicentre external validation studies with large patients' cohorts are needed.

Does the carinal involvement have the same surgical outcome as the main bronchus involvement in patients with non-small cell lung cancer?

OBJECTIVE: Carinal and main bronchus involvement were compared in terms of the survival of patients with N0-1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Sixty-six NSCLC patients who underwent complete surgical carinal resection/reconstruction (Carina group) and complete resection because of main bronchus involvement (Main Bronchus group) between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The Carina group included 30 patients and the Main Bronchus group included 36. In the Carina group, conditions other than carinal involvement that rendered patients pathological (p) T4, and in the Main Bronchus group, conditions that would upstage the pT status from pT2 were excluded. Patients with mediastinal lymph node metastases were excluded. Thus, an isolated main bronchial invasion and isolated carinal invasion patient population was tried to be obtained. RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival rate was 49.4% (median 61.5 ± 19.9 months). The 5-year survival rates of patients in the Carina group was 49.2% (median 63.3 months), and that of patients in the Main Bronchus group was 46.4% (median 55.9 months). The difference between survival rates was not statistically significant (p = 0.761). The survival rates of pN0 and pN1 patients also did not differ significantly (63.2% vs. 45.5%, p = 0.207). Recurrence was significantly more common in the Main Bronchus group than the Carina group (28.1% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Isolated carinal invasion had a comparable outcome to isolated main bronchus invasion in pN0-1 patients with NSCLC who are undergoing anatomical surgical resection.